CompareAI models

MiniMax-M2.7MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNvidiaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
MiniMax-M2.7	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	78/100	60/100	47/100	0/100	0/100
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B	0/100	37/100	87/100	61/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

MiniMax

NVIDIA

Context length

205K

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

MiniMax

NVIDIA

Pricing

Input

$0.30/ 1M

$0.05/ 1M

Output

$1.20/ 1M

$0.20/ 1M

Cached input

$0.06/ 1M

$0.01/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

82K

257K

Completed sessions

167,278

4,619,932

Token share

0.03%

0.51%

Tokens

271B-40%

4T+100%

AUG 1SEP 25

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

65.8%3K user-weeks

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.7Jamba Mini Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Mini Related comparisonMiniMax-M2.7 vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M2.7Jamba Large Related comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Large