Compare AI models: MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs MiniMax-M3
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- MiniMax-M3MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 41/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| MiniMax-M3 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 83/100 | 53/100 | 93/100 | 50/100 | 21/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
205K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.61/ 1M
$0.33/ 1M
Output
$2.44/ 1M
$1.32/ 1M
Cached input
$0.06/ 1M
$0.07/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
0
206K
Completed sessions
0
1,654,864
Token share
0%
0.18%
Tokens
00%
2T-61%
No trend data
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
63.7%13K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3·Jamba Mini