Compare AI models: MiniMax-M2.5 vs Grok 4.5
- MiniMax-M2.5MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.5xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M2.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 51/100 | 58/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 90/100 | 25/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 57/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
205K
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.27/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$1.08/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
27K
7.2K
Completed sessions
78,909
38,250
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
15B-53%
758M-99%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.5%219 user-weeks
46.4%373 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.5 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.5 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.5·Jamba Mini