GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen 3.8 Max Prime

  1. MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Qwen 3.8 Max PrimeAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
MiMo-V2.6-Pro47/100100/10060/10093/10067/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Qwen 3.8 Max Prime50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder13/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.47/ 1M
$4.00/ 1M
Output
$0.94/ 1M
$12/ 1M
Cached input
$0.005/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
81K
No usage
Completed sessions
378,504
No usage
Token share
0.16%
No usage
Tokens
1.5T+100%
No usage
AUG 18OCT 12
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.1%2.7K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.