Compare AI models: MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
MiMo-V2.6-Pro	47/100	100/100	60/100	92/100	67/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B	0/100	37/100	85/100	62/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Xiaomi

NVIDIA

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Audio, Video

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Xiaomi

NVIDIA

Pricing

Input

$0.47/ 1M

$0.05/ 1M

Output

$0.94/ 1M

$0.20/ 1M

Cached input

$0.005/ 1M

$0.01/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

81K

282K

Completed sessions

388,382

6,751,159

Token share

0.16%

0.48%

Tokens

1.6T+100%

4.7T+683%

AUG 18OCT 12

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

64.1%2.7K user-weeks

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.6-ProJamba Mini Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Mini Related comparisonMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Jamba LargeMiMo-V2.6-ProJamba Large Related comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Large