GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  1. MAI-Code-1.1-FlashMicrosoftHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder61/10054/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiMo-V2.6-Flash33/10057/10076/10093/10067/10055/100
Overview
Author
Context length
256K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.16/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.32/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.004/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
642K
Completed sessions
No usage
25,290,541
Token share
No usage
3.52%
Tokens
No usage
35T+100%
No trend data
AUG 21OCT 15
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
80.3%2.8K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.