Compare AI models: MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
- MAI-Code-1.1-FlashMicrosoftHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflectionHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAI-Code-1.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 59/100 | 54/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Beam 1.0 501B A23B | 50/100 | 88/100 | 61/100 | 93/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
256K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$1.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
127K
Completed sessions
No usage
3,127,904
Token share
No usage
0.58%
Tokens
No usage
6.6T+100%
No trend data
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMAI-Code-1.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMAI-Code-1.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Jamba MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Jamba Mini