Compare AI models: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Grok 4.7
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 93/100 | 83/100 | 93/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 28/100 | 75/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.002/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.4M
31K
Completed sessions
367,449,453
70,921
Token share
21.9%
0%
Tokens
218T+100%
38B+100%
AUG 20OCT 14
AUG 20OCT 14
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
67%41K user-weeks
42.5%785 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba LargeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba LargeGrok 4.7·Jamba Large