Compare AI models: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Grok 4.6
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
- Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 93/100 | 82/100 | 93/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
| Grok 4.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 36/100 | 28/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.002/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.4M
60K
Completed sessions
367,905,109
129,299
Token share
22.2%
0.01%
Tokens
220T+100%
77B+100%
AUG 21OCT 15
AUG 21OCT 15
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
67%41K user-weeks
40.8%3.2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGrok 4.6 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.6·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba LargeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGrok 4.6 vs Jamba LargeGrok 4.6·Jamba Large