CompareAI models
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
- GPT-6.1 SolOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 100/100 | 85/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 21/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
$0.002/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
892K
No usage
Completed sessions
284,691,945
No usage
Token share
15.8%
No usage
Tokens
137T+100%
No usage
AUG 5SEP 29
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
67.5%24K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGPT-6.1 Sol vs Jamba MiniGPT-6.1 Sol·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba LargeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGPT-6.1 Sol vs Jamba LargeGPT-6.1 Sol·Jamba Large