Compare AI models: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor vs Grok 4.6
- Muse Spark 1.2 ContributorMeta
- Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor | 0/100 | 40/100 | 83/100 | 93/100 | 83/100 | 0/100 |
| Grok 4.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 36/100 | 28/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.002/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
461K
59K
Completed sessions
324,243,635
128,256
Token share
3.95%
0.01%
Tokens
39T+20,288%
77B+100%
AUG 20OCT 14
AUG 20OCT 14
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
78.3%9.1K user-weeks
40.8%3.2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.2 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.2 Contributor·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGrok 4.6 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.6·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.2 Contributor vs Jamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2 Contributor·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGrok 4.6 vs Jamba LargeGrok 4.6·Jamba Large