Compare AI models: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Muse Spark 1.2 ContributorMeta
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor | 0/100 | 41/100 | 82/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 0/100 |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 69/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.002/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
377K
2
Completed sessions
323,247,840
8
Token share
3.21%
0%
Tokens
33T+422%
5.7K+100%
AUG 25OCT 19
AUG 25OCT 19
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
76.6%7.4K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.2 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.2 Contributor·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.2 Contributor vs Jamba LargeMuse Spark 1.2 Contributor·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba Large