Compare AI models: LongCat-2.5-Preview vs Hy3

LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituanHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Hy3Tencent

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
LongCat-2.5-Preview	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	56/100	81/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Hy3	67/100	68/100	70/100	53/100	0/100	40/100

Overview

Author

Meituan

Tencent

Context length

256K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Meituan

Tencent

Pricing

Input

$0.30/ 1M

$0.14/ 1M

Output

$1.20/ 1M

$0.58/ 1M

Cached input

$0.006/ 1M

$0.04/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

291K

64K

Completed sessions

15,849,760

465,894

Token share

0.73%

0.02%

Tokens

9T+100%

212B-97%

SEP 6OCT 31

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

62.6%2.8K user-weeks

64%1.9K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.5-PreviewDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeHy3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy3Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.5-PreviewJamba Mini Related comparisonHy3 vs Jamba MiniHy3Jamba Mini