Compare AI models: LongCat-2.0 vs Grok 4.6
- LongCat-2.0Meituan
- Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongCat-2.0 | 24/100 | 69/100 | 56/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 29/100 |
| Grok 4.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 39/100 | 25/100 | 74/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
52K
41K
Completed sessions
541,342
98,371
Token share
0.02%
0%
Tokens
292B-33%
39B-2%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.7%643 user-weeks
34.9%2.2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.0 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.0·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.6·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonLongCat-2.0 vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.0·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.6 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.6·Jamba Mini