Compare AI models: LongCat-2.0 vs GPT-6.1 Terra
- LongCat-2.0Meituan
- GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongCat-2.0 | 24/100 | 69/100 | 36/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 29/100 |
| GPT-6.1 Terra | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 27/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.75/ 1M
$1.00/ 1M
Output
$3.00/ 1M
$5.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
55K
No usage
Completed sessions
546,988
No usage
Token share
0.03%
No usage
Tokens
382B+39%
No usage
SEP 1OCT 26
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.3%753 user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.0 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.0·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-6.1 Terra vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-6.1 Terra·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonLongCat-2.0 vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.0·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Jamba MiniGPT-6.1 Terra·Jamba Mini