Compare AI models: LongCat-2.0 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B
- LongCat-2.0Meituan
- Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongCat-2.0 | 24/100 | 69/100 | 39/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 29/100 |
| Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 93/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.75/ 1M
Unknown
Output
$3.00/ 1M
Unknown
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
54K
No usage
Completed sessions
493,089
No usage
Token share
0.04%
No usage
Tokens
447B+156%
No usage
AUG 27OCT 21
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
66.5%770 user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.0 vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.0·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonLongCat-2.0 vs Jamba LargeLongCat-2.0·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B·Jamba Large