Compare AI models: LongCat-2.0 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.0Meituan
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongCat-2.0 | 26/100 | 69/100 | 58/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 29/100 |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | 0/100 | 37/100 | 85/100 | 62/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
51K
282K
Completed sessions
384,140
6,751,159
Token share
0.05%
0.48%
Tokens
455B+237%
4.7T+683%
AUG 18OCT 12
AUG 18OCT 12
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.8%701 user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.0 vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.0·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonLongCat-2.0 vs Jamba LargeLongCat-2.0·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Jamba Large