Compare AI models: LongCat-2.0 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- LongCat-2.0Meituan
- Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongCat-2.0 | 24/100 | 69/100 | 57/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 29/100 |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 17/100 | 93/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
55K
43
Completed sessions
539,792
62
Token share
0.04%
0%
Tokens
412B+87%
17M+100%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
66.6%772 user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.0 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.0·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3.1 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonLongCat-2.0 vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.0·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Jamba MiniKimi K3.1 Pro·Jamba Mini