GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  1. MAI-Code-1.1-FlashMicrosoftHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder61/10054/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiMo-V2.6-Pro47/100100/10061/10093/10067/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
256K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.47/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.94/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.005/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
85K
Completed sessions
No usage
404,712
Token share
No usage
0.17%
Tokens
No usage
1.6T+100%
No trend data
AUG 19OCT 13
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
64.1%2.7K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.