Compare AI models: LongCat-2.5-Preview vs Sonar Deep Research
- LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituanHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexityHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongCat-2.5-Preview | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 58/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Sonar Deep Research | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 24/100 | 21/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 — Tool calling not supported |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
128K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$8.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
159K
No usage
Completed sessions
8,033,854
No usage
Token share
0.61%
No usage
Tokens
5.9T+100%
No usage
AUG 18OCT 12
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.5%757 user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.5-Preview·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeSonar Deep Research vs Jamba MiniSonar Deep Research·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Jamba LargeLongCat-2.5-Preview·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonSonar Deep Research vs Jamba LargeSonar Deep Research·Jamba Large