Compare AI models: Ling 3.1 Flash vs Hy3
- Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Hy3Tencent
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 100/100 | 61/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Hy3 | 67/100 | 70/100 | 69/100 | 51/100 | 0/100 | 43/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.00/ 1M
$0.16/ 1M
Output
$0.00/ 1M
$0.64/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.7K
357K
Completed sessions
72,841
6,104,926
Token share
0%
0.75%
Tokens
30B+100%
6.9T+4,917%
AUG 10OCT 4
AUG 10OCT 4
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
68.1%3.5K user-weeks