GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash

  1. Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Ling 3.1 Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder60/10064/1000/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Qwen3.8 Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder71/10082/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.16/ 1M
Output
$0.90/ 1M
$0.47/ 1M
Cached input
$0.06/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
41K
228K
Completed sessions
825,434
2,048,249
Token share
0.02%
0.26%
Tokens
252B+100%
2.9T+8,821%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
63.1%9.7K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.