GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Ling 3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3

  1. Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Kimi K3MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Ling 3.1 Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder100/10061/1000/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Kimi K3100/100100/10012/10092/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.00/ 1M
$3.00/ 1M
Output
$0.00/ 1M
$15/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
7.2K
433K
Completed sessions
141,862
712,180
Token share
0.01%
0.1%
Tokens
59B+100%
957B-17%
AUG 11OCT 5
AUG 11OCT 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
35.8%47K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.