Compare AI models: Ling 3.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling 3.1 FlashinclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- MiniMax-M2.5MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 100/100 | 61/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| MiniMax-M2.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 53/100 | 60/100 | 47/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.00/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$0.00/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
224
37K
Completed sessions
3,538
42,377
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
1.4B+100%
25B-32%
AUG 8OCT 2
AUG 8OCT 2
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
59.5%343 user-weeks