Compare AI models: Grok 4.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 27/100 | 75/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | 0/100 | 37/100 | 86/100 | 64/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
500K
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.50/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
29K
278K
Completed sessions
64,332
6,730,804
Token share
0%
0.47%
Tokens
35B+100%
4.6T+549%
AUG 19OCT 13
AUG 19OCT 13
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
42.5%785 user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba LargeGrok 4.7·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Jamba Large