GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Nano Banana 2.1 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

  1. Nano Banana 2.1GoogleHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Nano Banana 2.150/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder24/10037/10067/1000/100 — Tool calling not supported
Kimi K3.1 Pro50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder17/10093/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
131K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text, Image
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.50/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$7.50/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.20/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
43
Completed sessions
No usage
62
Token share
No usage
0%
Tokens
No usage
17M+100%
No trend data
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.