GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Nano Banana 2.1 vs Kimi K3

  1. Nano Banana 2.1GoogleHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Kimi K3MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Nano Banana 2.150/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder28/10033/10067/1000/100 — Tool calling not supported
Kimi K3100/100100/10012/10092/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
131K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text, Image
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.50/ 1M
$3.00/ 1M
Output
$7.50/ 1M
$15/ 1M
Cached input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
391K
Completed sessions
No usage
747,051
Token share
No usage
0.09%
Tokens
No usage
868B-31%
No trend data
AUG 14OCT 8
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
35.8%47K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.