Compare AI models: GLM-5.3-Flash vs LongCat-2.5-Preview
- GLM-5.3-FlashZhipu
- LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituanHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-5.3-Flash | 56/100 | 35/100 | 71/100 | 81/100 | 67/100 | 0/100 |
| LongCat-2.5-Preview | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 58/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$0.50/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
$0.006/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.3M
157K
Completed sessions
19,597,582
7,934,167
Token share
6.64%
0.61%
Tokens
64T+100%
5.9T+100%
AUG 18OCT 12
AUG 18OCT 12
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
62.8%89K user-weeks
64.5%757 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGLM-5.3-Flash vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.3-Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.5-Preview·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.3-Flash vs Jamba LargeGLM-5.3-Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Jamba LargeLongCat-2.5-Preview·Jamba Large