GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: GLM-5.3-Flash vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

  1. GLM-5.3-FlashZhipu
  2. Llama 4 Scout 17B InstructMetaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
GLM-5.3-Flash56/10035/10071/10081/10067/1000/100
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct0/100 — Reasoning not supported50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder67/100100/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
10M
Reasoning
True
False
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.18/ 1M
Output
$0.50/ 1M
$0.59/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.3M
No usage
Completed sessions
19,597,582
No usage
Token share
6.64%
No usage
Tokens
64T+100%
No usage
AUG 18OCT 12
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
62.8%89K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.