GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

  1. Nano Banana 2.1GoogleHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Llama 4 Scout 17B InstructMetaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Nano Banana 2.150/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder27/10034/10067/1000/100 — Tool calling not supported
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct0/100 — Reasoning not supported50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder67/100100/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
131K
10M
Reasoning
True
False
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text, Image
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.50/ 1M
$0.18/ 1M
Output
$7.50/ 1M
$0.59/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
No usage
Completed sessions
No usage
No usage
Token share
No usage
No usage
Tokens
No usage
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.