Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Sonar Deep Research
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexityHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 58/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Sonar Deep Research | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 24/100 | 21/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 — Tool calling not supported |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
128K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$8.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.9M
No usage
Completed sessions
35,673,970
No usage
Token share
20.7%
No usage
Tokens
202T+100%
No usage
AUG 18OCT 12
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.2%249K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeSonar Deep Research vs Jamba MiniSonar Deep Research·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonSonar Deep Research vs Jamba LargeSonar Deep Research·Jamba Large