Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 Max Prime
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Qwen 3.8 Max PrimeAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 59/100 | 82/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Qwen 3.8 Max Prime | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 12/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$4.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$12/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2M
No usage
Completed sessions
37,825,549
No usage
Token share
21.3%
No usage
Tokens
208T+100%
No usage
AUG 19OCT 13
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.2%249K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeQwen 3.8 Max Prime vs Jamba MiniQwen 3.8 Max Prime·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonQwen 3.8 Max Prime vs Jamba LargeQwen 3.8 Max Prime·Jamba Large