Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash	100/100	100/100	59/100	82/100	33/100	92/100
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B	0/100	37/100	86/100	64/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.30/ 1M

$0.05/ 1M

Output

$1.20/ 1M

$0.20/ 1M

Cached input

$0.006/ 1M

$0.01/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

279K

Completed sessions

37,314,401

6,752,206

Token share

21.2%

0.47%

Tokens

207T+100%

4.6T+553%

AUG 19OCT 13

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

64.2%249K user-weeks

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.