Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash	100/100	100/100	58/100	81/100	33/100	92/100
MiMo-V2.6-Pro	47/100	100/100	60/100	92/100	67/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Context length

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text, Image, Audio, Video

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.30/ 1M

$0.47/ 1M

Output

$1.20/ 1M

$0.94/ 1M

Cached input

$0.006/ 1M

$0.005/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

1.9M

81K

Completed sessions

35,553,110

383,416

Token share

20.7%

0.16%

Tokens

201T+100%

1.5T+100%

AUG 18OCT 12

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

64.2%249K user-weeks

64.1%2.7K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.