Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Nano Banana 2.1GoogleHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 58/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Nano Banana 2.1 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 27/100 | 34/100 | 67/100 | 0/100 — Tool calling not supported |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
131K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text, Image
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$1.50/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$7.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.9M
No usage
Completed sessions
35,153,057
No usage
Token share
20.6%
No usage
Tokens
200T+100%
No usage
AUG 18OCT 12
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.2%249K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeNano Banana 2.1 vs Jamba MiniNano Banana 2.1·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonNano Banana 2.1 vs Jamba LargeNano Banana 2.1·Jamba Large