Try OpenCodeTry OpenCode

Compare AI models: deepseek-v4p1-flash-spot vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

  1. deepseek-v4p1-flash-spotDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
deepseek-v4p1-flash-spot50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
Kimi K3.1 Pro50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder19/10092/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
1M
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$1.80/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$9.00/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.18/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
11K
96K
Completed sessions
81,638
260,552
Token share
0.02%
0.04%
Tokens
227B+100%
563B+100%
SEP 21NOV 15
SEP 21NOV 15
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
56.6%2.6K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.