GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  1. DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
  2. MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Pro100/100100/10044/10081/1000/10068/100
MiMo-V2.6-Pro44/100100/10058/10092/10067/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.66/ 1M
$0.47/ 1M
Output
$1.98/ 1M
$0.94/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.005/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
398K
167K
Completed sessions
1,520,136
829,616
Token share
0.42%
0.27%
Tokens
5.6T-79%
3.6T+100%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
56%30K user-weeks
66.8%6.8K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.