Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs pulse-alpha
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- pulse-alphaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 42/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| pulse-alpha | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
Unknown
Reasoning
True
Unknown
Input modalities
Text
Unknown
Output modalities
Text
Unknown
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.96/ 1M
Unknown
Output
$1.91/ 1M
Unknown
Cached input
$0.08/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
399K
14K
Completed sessions
1,521,036
160,645
Token share
0.42%
0.09%
Tokens
5.6T-79%
1.2T+100%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
56%30K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativepulse-alpha vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instructpulse-alpha·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonpulse-alpha vs Jamba Minipulse-alpha·Jamba Mini