Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs mai-experimental-test
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- mai-experimental-testHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 37/100 | 80/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| mai-experimental-test | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
Unknown
Reasoning
True
Unknown
Input modalities
Text
Unknown
Output modalities
Text
Unknown
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.74/ 1M
Unknown
Output
$3.48/ 1M
Unknown
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
963K
56K
Completed sessions
1,453,630
585,872
Token share
1.88%
0.03%
Tokens
17T-42%
273B+100%
AUG 8OCT 2
AUG 8OCT 2
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
56.1%92K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniNearby alternativemai-experimental-test vs Jamba Minimai-experimental-test·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonmai-experimental-test vs Jamba Largemai-experimental-test·Jamba Large