Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 45/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 32/100 | 96/100 | 58/100 | 53/100 | 50/100 | 55/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.66/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Output
$1.98/ 1M
$1.15/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
402K
No usage
Completed sessions
1,469,631
No usage
Token share
0.43%
No usage
Tokens
5.4T-81%
No usage
SEP 7NOV 1
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
55%36K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeStep 3.7 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructStep 3.7 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba MiniStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba Mini