Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflectionHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 39/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| Beam 1.0 501B A23B | 50/100 | 88/100 | 61/100 | 93/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.90/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$2.70/ 1M
$1.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
458K
127K
Completed sessions
1,396,290
3,127,904
Token share
0.5%
0.58%
Tokens
5.7T-82%
6.6T+100%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
58.3%44K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Jamba MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Jamba Mini