Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 35/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 93/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.60/ 1M
Unknown
Output
$3.20/ 1M
Unknown
Cached input
$0.14/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
470K
No usage
Completed sessions
1,303,655
No usage
Token share
0.53%
No usage
Tokens
5.6T-83%
No usage
AUG 27OCT 21
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
58.1%44K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B·Jamba Large