Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 39/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 17/100 | 93/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.90/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$2.70/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
458K
43
Completed sessions
1,396,290
62
Token share
0.5%
0%
Tokens
5.7T-82%
17M+100%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
58.3%44K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3.1 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Jamba MiniKimi K3.1 Pro·Jamba Mini