Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash-Preview
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash-PreviewMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 35/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash-Preview | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 100/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.74/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Output
$3.48/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
664K
No usage
Completed sessions
1,455,718
No usage
Token share
0.85%
No usage
Tokens
8.3T-76%
No usage
AUG 18OCT 12
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.7%56K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash-Preview vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash-Preview·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash-Preview vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash-Preview·Jamba Large