Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 62/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 69/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.43/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$0.87/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
508K
2
Completed sessions
1,362,644
8
Token share
0.59%
0%
Tokens
6.1T-82%
5.7K+100%
AUG 25OCT 19
AUG 25OCT 19
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
58.1%44K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba Large