GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

  1. DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
  2. Llama 4 Scout 17B InstructMetaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Pro100/100100/10030/10081/1000/10068/100
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct0/100 — Reasoning not supported50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder67/100100/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
10M
Reasoning
True
False
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.35/ 1M
$0.18/ 1M
Output
$4.05/ 1M
$0.59/ 1M
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
409K
No usage
Completed sessions
1,475,948
No usage
Token share
0.43%
No usage
Tokens
5.4T-81%
No usage
SEP 6OCT 31
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
55%36K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.