GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon

  1. DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
  2. Gemini 4 ArgonGoogleHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Pro100/100100/10033/10082/1000/10068/100
Gemini 4 Argon50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder18/10093/10083/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.74/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$3.48/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
630K
No usage
Completed sessions
1,432,324
No usage
Token share
0.79%
No usage
Tokens
7.8T-77%
No usage
AUG 19OCT 13
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.7%56K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.