CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 87/100 | 37/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 44/100 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | 100/100 | No data | 38/100 | 93/100 | 83/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.60/ 1M
$0.75/ 1M
Output
$3.20/ 1M
$3.75/ 1M
Cached input
$0.14/ 1M
$0.07/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.5M
No usage
Completed sessions
2,971,632
No usage
Token share
6.45%
No usage
Tokens
30T+23%
No usage
JUL 9SEP 2
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
65.2%137K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITDeepSeek V4 Pro·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeGemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITGemini 3.8 Flash·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextDeepSeek V4 Pro·Qwen3.8 Flash NextRelated comparisonGemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGemini 3.8 Flash·Qwen3.8 Flash Next