CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 87/100 | 51/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 44/100 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | 100/100 | No data | 38/100 | 93/100 | 83/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.66/ 1M
$0.75/ 1M
Output
$1.98/ 1M
$3.75/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.07/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.3M
No usage
Completed sessions
2,278,311
No usage
Token share
3.98%
No usage
Tokens
24T-9%
No usage
JUL 22SEP 15
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.9%118K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITDeepSeek V4 Pro·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeGemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITGemini 3.8 Flash·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902DeepSeek V4 Pro·Qwen3.8 Max 0902Related comparisonGemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Gemini 3.8 Flash·Qwen3.8 Max 0902