CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 89/100 | 71/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 44/100 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | 100/100 | No data | 55/100 | 93/100 | 100/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.43/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$0.87/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003625/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.4M
No usage
Completed sessions
4,410,945
No usage
Token share
21.3%
No usage
Tokens
30T+198%
No usage
MAY 28JUL 22
No trend data
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max PreviewDeepSeek V4 Pro·Qwen3.8 Max PreviewNearby alternativeGemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.8 Max PreviewGemini 3.5 Flash Lite·Qwen3.8 Max PreviewRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.7 PlusDeepSeek V4 Pro·Qwen3.7 PlusRelated comparisonGemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.7 PlusGemini 3.5 Flash Lite·Qwen3.7 Plus