CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 89/100 | 70/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 44/100 |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 100/100 | No data | 64/100 | 93/100 | 100/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.43/ 1M
$0.25/ 1M
Output
$0.87/ 1M
$1.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003625/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.2M
No usage
Completed sessions
4,331,019
No usage
Token share
22.4%
No usage
Tokens
29T+353%
No usage
MAY 20JUL 14
No trend data
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.7 PlusDeepSeek V4 Pro·Qwen3.7 PlusNearby alternativeGemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.7 PlusGemini 3.1 Flash Lite·Qwen3.7 PlusRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.7 MaxDeepSeek V4 Pro·Qwen3.7 MaxRelated comparisonGemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.7 MaxGemini 3.1 Flash Lite·Qwen3.7 Max